RSS 2.0

Articles Listing

Monday, November 09, 2009

The British Dare to Determine Who is a Jew

Every once in a while a story comes along so jolting that it is scarcely believable. One such story was that which appeared in the New York Times of all places this past Sunday about how the Jews’ Free School in London has been ordered to admit a child whose mother had a non-orthodox conversion after the child’s parents sued. I will not here enter into the ongoing and bitter divide in England between orthodox and progressive Jews. It was a battle that I witnessed and worked hard to mend through countless essays and public forums over the eleven years that I lived in the UK.  Less so will I here address the very pressing questions of Jewish status as determined by conversion on the part of Judaism’s three major branches. I am a passionately orthodox Jew who is equally passionate about Jewish unity. Our divisions must indeed be addressed and healed. But this shocking story in Britain raises something far more pressing that is of equal concern to orthodox and non-orthodox alike.

What is mindboggling is how a British court of appeals, which ruled against the school, said that the Jewish community’s ancient tradition of deciding Jewishness through parenthood is ethnically-based, discriminatory, and therefore unlawful.

“The requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission his mother must be Jewish, whether by descent or conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act,” the court said. Whether the reasons were “benign or malignant, theological or supremacist makes it no less and no more unlawful.” In an astonishing ruling, the court said that if the child practiced Judaism then he is Jewish. But to base it on his parents was an unlawful emphasis on ethnicity rather than on religious faith. One can immediately understand the implications for Jews who are not at all observant. Presumably the British government would not consider them Jews.

Now, let’s put aside for a moment the unbelievable infringement of government in the affairs of a religion and focus instead on the court’s rationale. In you are living in Britain you become a citizen automatically if your parents are British. Even if you don’t behave particularly British, or hate the country of your birth, the UK cannot take away your passport. And if you’re an American living abroad, your children automatically acquire American citizenship. I should know because six of my nine children were born in Britain. And even though only one of their parents was American and living in Europe to boot, they automatically became Americans. Even if you never celebrated the Fourth of July or ever heard of Abraham Lincoln, you and your children are as American as George Washington himself.

So is it really that difficult for British judges to understand that peoplehood is conveyed through a parent?

The Jews are first and foremost a people and only secondary a faith. We were the children of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob before we received the Torah at Mt. Sinai and began practicing Judaism’s tenets. Peoplehood comes first and is completely independent of any kind of religious affirmation. Jewishness is not something that can be lost and it is not something that can be renounced.

In this sense Judaism is radically different to Christianity which is a conscious act of affirmation. While there cannot be atheist Christians there are plenty of atheist Jews.

I am gobsmacked that a British court is challenging this. In my eleven years living in Britain I never heard anything so outrageous. This ruling constitutes a legal assault on the very integrity of the Jewish religion as practiced in Britain and is a watershed moment in modern Jewish history. And with all the recent stories of British academics seeking to bar their Israeli counterparts from conferences and the rise of anti-Semitic incidents in the British isles, it will only further cement world opinion that Britain is a country that is becoming hostile to Jews.

Being a people does not make us a homogenous ethic group. There are black Jews and white Jews, European Jews and Asian Jews. Converts of every ethnicity can of course join us at any time. But in so doing they are not adopting a faith but a people. They do not become merely practitioners of the Jewish fait but part of the Jewish family. A convert is transformed from an outsider into a Jewish brother or sister. But the process must of course have standards. To be a British citizen is not an arbitrary act. It takes approximately ten years of residency. Likewise, my Australian wife’s naturalization as an American citizen took many years of residency and passing a test of American knowledge.

Now just imagine how absurd it would be if the United States told Britain to alter its residency requirements, or vice versa, and you can begin to understand the chutzpa of British judges trying to alter the identity requirements of a three-and-half thousand year faith that is the precursor of Christianity.

Next week my organization This World: The Values Network will sponsor the first-ever conference on Jewish values. It will feature some of the world’s leading Jewish personalities, including Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, Yeshiva University President Richard Joel, Alan Dershowitz, Dennis Prager, Michael Steinhardt, AIPAC president David Victor and Marianne Williamson. One of our religion’s principal values is community and peoplehood. For thousands of years, dispersed throughout the world, Jews have always looked out for each other. You could turn up in any city and, regardless of level of observance, you would be invited to someone’s home for the Sabbath and feel like family even though just moments before you were a complete stranger. In light of this outrageous British legal challenge to this time-honored principle of Jewish peoplehood we will be adding an entire plenary devoted to explicating the special Jewish value of identity and peoplehood and hope that it will assist British Jewry in knowing that they are not alone in this critical battle.

 

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is founder of This World: The Values Network. To register for The Jewish Values Conference, taking place in NYC on Nov. 17 and 18, go to http://www.thisworld.us.

Comments

  • Monday, November 09, 2009

    gurevitzr

    There are some important factual details missing from your article that I think are necessary to understand the complexity of the UK case (which I’ve been following carefully since June; I’m a rabbi living and working in the US, originally from London).  The original court decision made it clear that in no way were the courts interfering with the rights of individual Jewish denominations to determine who is a Jew for the purposes of synagogue affiliation, Jewish lifecycle ritual, etc.  Rather, as a state-funded (and that is the vital information) faith-based school, it must follow all laws pertaining to state-funded schools, which do not allow any discrimination on the basis of race.  While we know that Jewish identity is a combination of both ancestry and practice, for the sole purpose of determining criteria for acceptance into a faith-based STATE FUNDED school, only the practice criteria may be applied, as is the case in Christian or Muslim schools.  It would require closer examination and debate, but this may be a case of ‘the law of the land is law’.  What is interesting is that the new form created by JFS to get Jewish practice ‘points’ from your synagogue, make synagogue prayer service a required element - you can get the 3 points now needed just by attending services regularly, but you can’t get the 3 points by a combination of attending Religious school classes and involvement in social action/volunteer agencies without also having attended some prayer services.  While this clearly is not a desirable methodology, it does provide a fascinating case study for thinking about Jewish identity and, if they choose to take it as such, could become a wonderful opportunity for synagogues to think of ways of making their congregations meaningful places for families who want their children to go to these excellent schools, so that they’ll want to keep coming, even if they were only initially spurred by needing the ‘points.‘

    There is also much to be said about the choice of what was (until Sept 2010) the only Jewish high school in London to allow the United Synagogue to determine its policies in recent decades, and the other cases that were brought prior to the current one, that included a woman who was converted to Judaism by a Sephardic rabbi in Israel not being considered Jewish by the United Synagogue Beth Din, also leading to her child being denied entry to the Jewish Free School.  We didn’t have to end up here but, as we did, I do not believe it is as clear cut as you seem to find it to conclude that the British courts were in the wrong here.  But the specifics and the context matter, and I hope my clarifications help to add some nuance to the debate.
    Respectfully,
    Rabbi Rachel Gurevitz

  • Monday, November 30, 2009

    Toffeeman

    Rabbi

    The British Courts have no more determined who is a Jew than they determine who is black, white, Catholic or Muslim.

    Schools are not allowed to discriminate on the basis of ancestry.  You are allowed to discriminate on the basis of belief, something I am very much opposed to but then I don’t write the law.  You are not allowed to discriminate on the basis of membership of “a people”.

    If you limit admittance to the school, say, to those who attend a synagogue then you are fine.  If you decide that no one is Jewish unless [insert criteria here] then you are fine.  If you do both at the same time then you are fine.


    What you cannot do is if (and note the if), if your [insert criteria here] involve ethnicity, ancestry, membership of a people etc., then you cannot also use those same criteria as part of your school’s admissions policy.

  • Monday, December 14, 2009

    joy77

    Christians are the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jesus is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He is the Messiah.
    Come to HIM, His message of salvation is for ALL. Many jews, one third of jews in those days, accepted Jesus as the Messiah.
    Jesus is the last word from the faith that started with Abraham.
    Therefore there is no more jew or Greek or gentile…We are all redeemed!
    Rejoice!

To comment, please login or complete the free registration.