RSS 2.0

Articles Listing

Thursday, January 19, 2012

What is Motivating the Global Ban on Kosher Jesus?

What is Motivating the Global Ban on Kosher Jesus?

A Response to Rabbi Schochet

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-shmuley-boteach/post_2875_b_1216383.html

By Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Rabbi Immanuel Schochet, who recently issued a letter banning anyone from reading my book Kosher Jesus, calling it heretical, is someone whose writings and lectures I have long admired. I also twice had the pleasure of hosting him at the University of Oxford where he spoke to my students.

Nevertheless, I must retain the right to defend myself against the appalling and libelous charge of heresy.  America is not Iran and Rabbis in the American Jewish community are not the Revolutionary Guard. We are different to the Khomeinis of the world who ban books and declare interdicts against their authors. We Jews are the people of the book, not the people who ban books. To the extent that Rabbi Schochet found anything objectionable in Kosher Jesus – and since it is only being released on 1 February I fear the book’s detractors sent him a pirated, electronic copy that is unlawfully being circulated and which is full of errors – he could easily have contacted me or publicly stated his objections. But banning a book on the charge of heresy without any mention whatsoever of what the heresy consists of is outrageous, an affront to decency, and a betrayal of scholarship. Calling an author a heretic without backing up the charge is positively scandalous.

Rabbi Schochet seems to have significantly changed his approach to Judaism and Christianity since his lectures under my auspices. Back then he orated openly on Jesus and the New Testament, rebutting missionary claims and engaging missionaries in public dialogue and exchange. There are hundreds of his tapes that attest to this fact. But in the letter he sent to Chabad websites, where I have been pilloried for the past week, he suddenly refuses to even mention the name Jesus, capitulating to the websites demands that Jesus be referred to as “J” and banning my book and calling it heretical without citing a single example as to why. What motivated him to betray his own reputation as a scholar? He himself wrote in his condemnatory letter, “It is not normally my style to write letters of condemnation.” So what changed?

Kosher Jesus is, after all, a book which Publisher’s Weekly – the platinum standard in book reviews – called an “informed and cogent primer on Jesus of Nazareth…. a brave stab at re-evaluating Jesus through an intensive look at the New Testament and historical documents… and a well-researched analysis that will certainly reopen intrafaith and interfaith dialogue.” If Rabbi Schochet disagreed with Publisher’s Weekly, surely he should have cited scholarly arguments – even a single one – based on Jewish sources, rather repudiating the very essence of scholarly discourse by bizarrely resorting to medieval book banning. Many people, myself included, look up to Rabbi Schochet and respect him specifically because he is one of the few outstanding scholars of secular subjects in Chabad. No doubt they will be deeply puzzled by his self-denigrating act of banning books on community noticeboards that normally focus on birth and engagement announcements and which have few, if any, journalistic standards.

I had already experienced something similar, about 14 years ago in Britain, when Rabbi Schochet’s son, Yitzchok, with whom I am friendly and who is a communal Rabbi in London, debated me in his synagogue on my best-seller on The Jewish Guide to Adultery: How to Turn your Marriage into an Illicit Affair, which uses Talmudic wisdom about erotic attraction to create passion in marriage. I will never forget how Rabbi Yitzchok Schochet proceeded to tear pages out of my book in front of the hundreds in the audience, as he went through his arguments, and cast them on the floor. I did not find this to be a dignified form of debate and said so. Destroying books in public is not the sign of a gentleman. Nor is it the sign of someone who is serious about intelligent debate. We Jews have had our experiences with those who destroy books.

Rabbi Yitzchok Schochet has also been strangely obsessed with Kosher Jesus ever since it was announced, Tweeting incessantly about it, including this one from last week, in advance of his father’s coming condemnation, “It’s not petty inciteful posts u should bother with. It’s what’s brewing behind the scenes by real experts that should worry u.” And moments after his father’s letter was published he Tweeted, “BREAKING NEWS: Worlds leading Jewish cult buster and authority on missionaries condemns @RabbiShmuley book.”

Indeed, his father, who wrote this bizarre attack on me out of the blue calling me a heretic, had an absolute responsibility, as part of full disclosure, to mention in his letter that both his son Yitzchok and I are being openly discussed as possible candidates for the position of Chief Rabbi of the UK, with significant media speculation as to my candidacy growing over the past two weeks even though, despite many high-profile endorsements, I have said I am not a declared candidate.

But be that as it may, as a renowned scholar, I believe, Rabbi Immanuel Schochet should treat books differently. A great expert of both Jewish and non-Jewish subjects is surely someone who respects scholarly publications, even ones he disagrees with, and should raise intelligent challenges and cite source material to corroborate his objections. But to ban a book outright and command thousands of people with such utter authoritarianism that they dare not read it, with absolutely no explanation? This has no place in scholarly discourse and is the kind of action that tarnishes the reputation of a serious scholar. I deeply respect Rabbi Schochet and am humbly offering to engage in a written or oral debate on the subject of my book at any reasonable time and place of his choosing.

But in defense of my book, let me say this: Kosher Jesus goes back to the original gospel source materials to uncover the real story of Jesus and portray him for whom he was prior to later Christian editors significantly modifying the story to accommodate the Romans. Jesus was, as many have argued before me, a Torah-observant Jew whose mission it was to restore Jewish observance fully among his Jewish brethren and fight Roman persecution. For doing so he was turned over by the Roman collaborator, High Priest Caiaphas, who owed his office to the Romans, and was murdered by the Roman prefect Pontias Pilate – the Saddam Hussein of the ancient world – for doing so. Jesus was a martyr for his people who never claimed to be divine, who never changed the Torah, and who would be scandalized to see his teachings – nearly all of which I trace back to their earlier Jewish sources – misused to persecute his people. It was Paul, who never met Jesus, who later deified him and said he came to get rid of Torah practice. But Jesus himself said the opposite, in Matthew 5:18, that anyone who does not keep the whole Torah would be cast out of heaven.

This is the ultimate argument against Christian missionaries and my book, for those Jews who care to read it, will offer significant information to argue convincingly against any Christian attempt to evangelize Jews.

Far from this theory being a heretical, as Rabbi Schochet says, it is expressly conveyed by Rabbi Jacob Emden (1697-1776) who, as Michael Scobak, head of education for the orthodox Jewish anti-missionary organization Jews for Judaism, notes in his pamphlet The Da Vinci Code: A Jewish Perspective was “one of the greatest Talmudists of the past 350 years.” Rabbi Emden, in 1757, authored a well-known letter about early Christianity which I quote:

Therefore, you must realize – and accept the truth from him who speaks it – that we see clearly here that the Nazarene and his Apostles did not wish to destroy the Torah from Israel, God forbid; for it is written so in Matthew (5:17-19), the Nazarene having said, “Do not suppose that I have come to abolish the Torah. I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. I tell you this: So long as heaven and earth endure, not a letter, not a stroke, will disappear from the Torah until all is accomplished. If any man therefore sets aside even the least of the Torah’s commandments, and teaches others to do the same, he will have the lowest place in the Kingdom of Heaven, whereas anyone who keeps the Torah, and teaches others so, will stand high in the Kingdom of Heaven.” This is also recorded in Luke 16:17. It is therefore exceedingly clear that the Nazarene never dreamed of nullifying the Torah.”

Scobak himself goes further and adds, “The Torah-positive stance taken by Jesus was maintained after his death by his disciples based in Jerusalem under the leadership of his brother James. Many of this group believed that non-Jews recruited by Paul should fully convert to Judaism by becoming circumcised and observing the entire Torah. Paul disagreed, and James chaired a conference in Jerusalem to decide the issue (Acts 15:1-29). Obviously, if the Jewish disciples led by James were not totally Torah observant themselves, they would have never insisted that all converts must maintain this standard and become Torah observant. James resolved the issue by deciding that Paul’s Gentile recruits would not have to convert to Judaism, but just observe the seven universal Noachide laws… The dominant voice of today’s Christian Bible is clearly Paul’s, either through his letters and epistles or through the writings of others under his influence. What a stunning example of history being written by the victors! For all intents and purposes, Christianity as we know it today is an invention of Paul. And all this, despite the fact that Paul never even met Jesus!”

So here you have Scobak, an orthodox Rabbi who heads education for the world’s most respected Jewish anti-missionary group, agreeing with my thesis which Rabbi Schochet, without a single source, calls heretical. It is now Rabbi Schochet who must explain his objections lest he be guilty of character assassination without justification, a grave sin in Judaism known as motzi shem ra.

But in reality this battle is about something far larger than me. Rabbi Schochet, through no fault of his own, came of age when Christians were seen primarily as proselytizers and as enemies of our people. But the past few decades have changed everything. Christians are today the State of Israel’s best friends. They visit Israel and support it arguably even more consistently than the Jewish community. They travel to Israel to show their love even during wars, with bombs falling on Israeli cities. Still, there are Jews who question their motives and wish to undermine the relationship. No matter how much the Pastor John Hagees of this world support Israel, or Glenn Beck, who gave a beautiful blurb for my book, some Jewish critics will say that they are doing so for ulterior motives, their love for the Jewish people not being genuine. I disagree. Jewish evangelical support for Israel is real and must be appreciated. And this book is written primarily for my Christian brothers and sisters who hunger to learn more about the Jewishness of Jesus, even as they disagree significantly with my conclusions. Many Christian personalities endorsed the book – so desperate are they to learn more of the Jewishness of Jesus and the Jewish origins of Christianity – even as they profoundly disagree with my insistence against the divinity of Jesus and the abrogation of the Law. They believe in the Bible and they believe that through the Jewish people they will be blessed. They yearn and hunger to discover more about the Jewishness of Jesus in order to experience their own faith more authentically.

No matter the pressure, I will not submit to a Judaism that is about censure, anti-intellectualism, close-mindedness, or contempt for scholarship. I believe in a Judaism that is orthodox, Torah-based, informed, modern, engaging, open, educated, fearless in the marketplace of ideas, and confident in its ability to win intelligent debate.

And why shouldn’t Judaism get the credit it deserves for the values it has disseminated to the world through Christianity. Virtually all Jewish ideas that have shaped the world have been taken from our people without attribution, so that Judaism is treated today as a discarded relic with no contemporary relevance.

We gave the world G-d. Today his name is Jesus Christ. We gave the world the Sabbath. Today it’s called Sunday. We gave the world the Ten Commandments. Today it is called morality. And we gave the world the Biblical insistence that all humans are created equally in the image of G-d. Today it’s called democracy. As a result, young Jews are not even aware of the transformative ideas of their religion, which might explain why they take insufficient pride in their tradition.

It’s time these universal Jewish ideas that have so influenced the world be traced back to their original source. It’s time that the Jewishness of Jesus be rediscovered by Christians. It’s time for the light of Judaism to brighten the world and for the Jews to live up to their ancient Biblical mandate as a light unto the nations.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach was the London Times Preacher of the Year at the Millennium and received the American Jewish Press Associations’ Highest Award for Excellence in Commentary as well as the National Fatherhood Award for his national TV Show Shalom in the Home. The international best-selling author of 27 books, his newest work Kosher Jesus will be published on February 1st. Follow him Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

Comments

  • Monday, January 23, 2012

    MrJames

    I think Mr. Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is not totally right because some of his content isn’t correct. There are some prefabricated bridges or bridge builder  can’t explain it. LOL… I don’t really a lover of reading and writing that’s why my grammar are not correct..

  • Sunday, February 12, 2012

    jakerandelle

    Nice post.It really helped me a lot and hope it will be helpful for others also. Thanks a bunch for sharing such useful post with excellent content in it. Keep blogging.
    Welding Training | bohemian clothing

  • Friday, February 24, 2012

    dressuk

    [url=“http://www.mekiband.com/uk-evening-dresses-67_68/”]Evening

    Dresses[/url]
    [url=“http://www.mekiband.com/uk-holiday-dresses-67_81/”]Holiday

    Dresses[/url]
    [url=“http://www.mekiband.com/uk-homecoming-dresses-67_80/”]Homecoming

    Dresses[/url]
    [url=“http://www.mekiband.com/uk-little-black-dresses-67_85/”]Little

    Black Dresses[/url]
    Prom Dresses
    [url=“http://www.mekiband.com/uk-quinceanera-dresses-

    67_83/”]Quinceanera Dresses[/url]

  • Sunday, February 26, 2012

    lydia

    President Johnson exprdfbgessed the same conclusion during their terms of soccer shoes. For the future of peace, precipitate withdrawal would be a disaster of immense magnitude. A nation cannot remain great if it betrays its allies and lets down its friends. Our defeat and white soccer shoes would promote recklessness in the councils of those great powers who have not yet abandoned their goals of worlds conquest. adidas f50 predator would spark violence wherever our commitments help maintain the peace—in the Middle East, in Berlin, eventually even in the Western Hemisphere. Ultimately, adidas f50 tunit uppers would cost more lives. It would not bring peace. It would bring more war. For these reasons I rejected the recommendation that wholesale soccer cleats should end the war by immediately withdrawing all of our forces. I chose instead to change American policy on both the negotiating front and the battle front in order to end the war fought on many nike ctr 360 maestri. I initiated a pursuit for peace on many fronts. In a television speech on May 14, in a speech before the United Nations, on a number of other occasions, I set forth our peace discount soccer cleats in great detail. We have offered the complete withdrawal of all outside forces within one year. We have proposed mercurial victory blue under international supervision. We have offered free elections under international supervision with the Communists participating in the organization and conduct of the elections mercurial soccer cleats as an organized political force. And the Saigon government has pledged to accept the result of the election. We have not put forth our cheap soccer cleats for kids on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. We have indicated that we’re willing to discuss the proposals that have been put forth by the other side. We have declared that cheap adidas soccer shoes is negotiable, except the right of the people of South Vietnam to determine their own future.  Lydia

  • Wednesday, February 29, 2012

    lop touuo

    mulberry4lady
    Mens Mulberry Handbags
    Mulberry Alexa Handbags
    Mulberry Antony Handbags
    Mulberry Bayswater Handbags
    Mulberry Briefcase Handbags
    [url=“http://www.mulberry4lady.com/mulberry-clutch-handbags-c-6.html”]
    <a href=“http://www.mulberry4lady.com/mulberry-handbags-c-8.html”>Mulberry Handbags[/url]
    Mulberry Hobo Bags
    Mulberry Holdall Handbags
    Mulberry Messenger Handbags
    Mulberry Purses and Wallets
    Mulberry Shoulder Bags
    Mulberry Totes Handbags
    tiffanyjewellery4mall

  • Wednesday, March 07, 2012

    Brook Williams

    I think they must visit garage door company and look for the best garage doors. I’m pretty sure it helps a lot.

  • Monday, March 12, 2012

    Samantha Knowls

    I always try to find something with which I agree when reading an article such as this, especially since I know that I will disagree with many things the rabbi has to say.
    poker table dining table

  • Thursday, March 29, 2012

    lydiao

    We meet at very shodasdrt intervals, not having adidas f50 adizero white had time to acquire any new value for each other. We meet at meals three times a day, and give each other a new taste of that old musty cheese that we are. We have had to agree on a certain adidas f50 orange set of rules, called etiquette and politeness, to make this frequent meeting tolerable and that we need not come to open war. We meet Black soccer shoes at the post-office, and at the sociable, and about the fireside every night; we live thick and are in each other’s way, and stumble over one another, and I think that we thus lose adidas soccer cleats some respect for one another. Certainly less frequency would suffice for all important and hearty communications. Consider Nike Mercurial Black the girls in a factory—-never alone, hardly in their dreams. It would be better if there were but one inhabitant to a square mile, as where I live. The value of a man is not in his nike soccer cleats skin, that we should touch him. I have a great deal of company in my house; especially in the morning, when nobody calls. Let me suggest a few nike mercurial cleats comparisons, that some one may convey an idea of my situation. I am no more lonely than the loon in the pond that laughs so loud, or than Walden Pond itself. What Nike Mercurial SL company has that lonely lake, I pray? And yet it has not the blue devils, but the blue angels in it, in the azure tint of its waters. The sun is alone, except Nike Mercurial Victory in thick weather, when there sometimes appear to be two, but one is a mock sun. god is alone—-but the devil, he is far from being alone Nike Mercurial Vapor supperfly; he sees a great deal of company; he is legion. I am no more lonely than a single mullein or dandelion in a pasture, or a bean turf soccer shoes leaf, or sorrel, or a horse-fly, or a bumblebee. I am no more lonely than the Millbrook, or a weathercock, or the north star, or the south wind, or an April shower, or a January thaw cheap soccer cleats, or the first spider in a new house. Be in a state of abundance of what you already have. I guarantee they are there; it always is buried soccer shoes for kids but there. Breathe them in as if they are the air you breathe because they are yours. Let go of anything that isn’t abundant for the time being. Name the shoe boxes in your closet nike mercurial orange with your gifts of abundance; pull from them every morning if needed.
    Lydia

  • Saturday, April 14, 2012

    xiaomei

    See Gucci Backpack with interlocking G detail 246321 Black this hand bag, Marni is probably to go, what kind of route. The bottom of the pumpkin yellow color with crystal carved stone gray, gray or black, different shades of Gucci Black Backpack Bag 246321 looks really delicate and gorgeous anomalies. The only question is really a bit too dense, a distance, a small map from the goose bumps ... to see if there is no Gucci Backpack Bag Khaki G281412-style immune and interested.

  • Tuesday, April 24, 2012

    lll8888

    In order to cost down ,the Coach Inc have moved most of their factory to china .So there are many
    Coach Outlet Stores in the internet ,who get the coach items from factory in china directly ,but they are not real
    Coach Outlet, they was not authourized by coach.href=“http://www.coachonlineoutletstores.com/coach-wallet-c-95.html”>Coach Wallet</a></b> from them ,maybe you will like it.

To comment, please login or complete the free registration.